Rule 18 of Order 26 under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (India) gives courts the power to send someone out to examine a witness who just can't make it to the courtroom. You know, when someone's really sick or too frail to show up. The whole point is that justice shouldn't get blocked just because somebody's stuck in bed or too weak to travel. So the court can appoint a commissioner to go to them instead. Rule 18: "Where any person to be examined as a witness resides within the local limits of the Court's jurisdiction, and is, by reason of sickness or infirmity, unable to attend the Court, the Court may issue a commission for his examination." So when does this actually kick in? The court doesn't just hand out commissions like candy. There are specific boxes to tick: And here's the thing—it's totally up to the judge's discretion. Just because you ask doesn't mean you get it. No automatic rights here. The process under Order 26, Rule 18 is pretty simple, honestly: People mix these two up all the time. The big difference? It's all about where the witness is located: Rule 18 is specifically for witnesses right there in the court's backyard who can't come because of health issues. Rule 19? That covers folks who live miles away—like, different city or state—for pretty much any reason. Absolutely. The court can shut it down if they think you're just wasting time or trying to stall the case. They have to be convinced the witness is genuinely unable to attend. "I just don't feel like coming" or "It's inconvenient" won't fly. You need real proof, like a doctor's note. If the witness gets better before the commissioner actually goes out, the court can cancel the whole thing and make them show up in person. But if the commission's already been done and the testimony is recorded, it stays valid. Can't undo that. Yeah, it applies to anyone being examined as a witness, including the actual parties in the case. If a plaintiff or defendant is sick or infirm, they can still get examined via commission. No discrimination there. For sure. This rule covers all types of examination—direct, cross, or re-examination. The commissioner just records the whole conversation, questions and answers included. Not technically mandatory, but honestly, you'd be crazy not to have one. Courts are way more likely to say yes if you've got a doctor's certificate. Without it, they might just say no and move on. Definitely. The other side can object if they think the sickness is fake, it's a delay tactic, or the procedure's wrong. The judge listens to both sides before making a call.What is the rule 18 of order 26
When can a Court issue a commission under Rule 18?
What is the procedure for issuing a commission under Rule 18?
What is the difference between Rule 18 and Rule 19 of Order 26?
Rule
Witness Location
Reason for Commission
Rule 18
Within court's jurisdiction
Sickness or infirmity
Rule 19
Outside court's jurisdiction
Any reason (including convenience)
Can a commission under Rule 18 be refused?
What happens if the witness recovers before the commission is executed?
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Rule 18 apply to parties to the suit?
Can a commission be issued for cross-examination under Rule 18?
Is a medical certificate mandatory for Rule 18?
Can the opposite party object to a commission under Rule 18?
Checklist for Applying under Rule 18
Resumen breve
Related articles
- What is the rule 18 of order 16
- What is order 7 rule 14 of CPC
- What drinks are not to order on a plane
- What is the pecking order of boats
